Mariza Partily, Rehearsal, 2012
Fashion meets Art... 16 artists with various works ( painting, mater painting, photography, installations, sculpture/constructions and graphics) influenced by
Fashion, they display and they show, through their work, how they perceive the
idea of fashion. The titled had already prepared us…
Manolis Anastasakos, Loft story, 2010
It’s a well known fact that fashion designers take inspiration from Art, they “steel” from it, they adapt it, they “transcribe” it… Let’s take a look at fashion, this time through the lense of these specific artists…
Marios Eleftheriades, Sin saves, 2012
Haris Kiprianou, Untitled, 2012
Spiros Drousiotis, Untitled 2, 2012
Andros Efstathiou*, the man who opened the door for us,
is in fact one of the sixteen artists, owner of the gallery and the curator of
this exhibition. We want to thank him for his friendly approach, for the time
he gave us and for accepting the call of SouMou for a mini interview regarding the exhibition and the relation between Art and Fashion…
1. Fashion loves art... does art love fashion?
Surely, Fashion loves Art. Besides, there are so many occasions in which fashion invested in studying art for the production of new collections.
Now,
whether Art loves Fashion? Whether artists love Fashion? I’m not so confident that there is a “big love” for Fashion, in the part of visual artists. Mostly they
turn away from it and in some other times their “connection” is created for the
service of mutual interests.
History, so far, taught us that Fashion
borrowed “elements” from Art and even stole entire works of art for its
products.
Art
exists and is created to make people think, to expose social-cultural problems
and set questions. Art is society’s reception. Fashion,
on the other hand, exists to satisfy vanity. –
At least the biggest part of Fashion’s industry is. – There is of course the
part of theatre costumes where we can find costumes based on ancient texts and
plays. On those cases, surely, we can notice –artistically- important pieces of
clothing or jewelry, which they don’t aim on their aesthetics, but come from
serious research and they are based on the text and its ideas.
For other cases, the “partnership” is
purely a matter of an economical deal.
2.Usually, artist who choose
fashion as a theme for their work, have a critical approach to it. Like in this exhibition, we looked at pieces that have
irony, a caustic sense of humor… As the curator, who selected these works, what
were your criteria?
As the curator, I chose artists based on
their body of work until now. What I noticed was that a lot of their works had
references to the Fashion world. The artists, themselves, might not have conceptualized
it, but for me, that was determinant for my decision to ask them to create
pieces influenced by the Fashion world overall.
What I’m saying is that, with the
exception of 3-4 pieces, the works displayed in this exhibition were created
exclusively for it. I do, honestly, believe many of these artists haven’t got
any associations –and they don’t want to-
with the Fashion world. I think this is exactly the reason of the sharpness
we witness in their works, the irony and indeed the caustic sense of humor regarding
Fashion.
3.What is
your opinion for clothes-accessories, which have clear referrals to the Art
world? Do you buy such pieces?
Look, I can admire a piece of clothing, a jewel… they can be fascinated by their aesthetics…but that’s it. Most of these products were just made to satisfy people’s vanity, and to have them dressed prettily. They don’t actually serve something deeper, nor do they set questions or testify thoughts on society and human race-and I don’t think they need to either… this is not their purpose.
No one will remember a dress, why should
they? A dress has never changed the course of history. An art work has.
All right, fashion
is always looking for inspirations. It operates in such a fast pace that is all
about inspirations.
No, I would
never buy clothes influenced from Art.
Out of the contrary.
No comments:
Post a Comment